Imagine that the CIA had been using software for years that could undetectably alter vote counts in electronic transit between ballot centres and central vote collection sites. How inevitable is it that sooner or later this same program would be used within the USA. There is a karma to this. The US played dirty games in other people’s elections for years, so it any wonder that having created the weapon and trained operatives to use it, that it would eventually come back to bite the US?
Electronic voting is a wild invitation for fraud. It can not be any other way.
Hammer and Scorecard are the names of the two programs designed by the CIA to interfere in foreign elections and now allegedly being used in the USA itself.
The General [Lt. Gen. McInerney] described “Hammer” and “Scorecard,” a pair of programs initially designed for the CIA before being privatized by Deep State players from the Obama administration. We explained how they work in an article last week, but the gist is this: “Hammer” or “THE HAMMER” is a counter-intelligence surveillance program used to spy on activities on protected networks (like voting machines) without detection while “Scorecard” is a vote-manipulation application that changes votes during transfer. It’s the least detectable form of election manipulation because it works during data transfer between voting stations and data storage hubs. Unless both sides are looking for irregularities, it’s impossible to catch. If nefarious forces had people on one side or the other (or both) during data transfer, it cannot be exposed.
Previously, Nov 2: Voting alterations are limited to something like 3% in each move to make it less obvious.
CIA program known as “Scorecard” allows its users to change voting outcomes by hacking into the transfer between local reporting stations and state or national data centers. According to McInerney, it’s a small amount, under 3%, to keep it from triggering any alarms. He would know. He served in top military positions under the Secretary of Defense and the Vice President of the United States.
Lou Dobbs talks to Sidney Powell, Michael Flynns defense attorney who calls for an urgent investigation
There is a brief discussion of the Software glitch at 22 mins on. and then more at 29 minutes. (UPDATE The Youtube has been deleted. Here’s a part of the interview on Bitchute.)
..
Hammer and Scorecard
At 29 minutes Sidney Powell (Michael Flynn’s Defence Attorney) talks about “Hammer and Scorecard“. The need to investigate the likelihood that 3% of the votes were changed across the country”. “We have some evidence that this can happen.” “We’ve used it against other countries, and now against our own people.” We’ll put it in the federal law suit. This is Coup 5.0.”
I think Hammer and Scorecard was broadly used.
“The President must fight back now.”
Tom Fitton [the president of Judicial Watch] points out that the State Legislatures have the right to install electors that will vote for Trump if the election process has been compromised.
h/t to Bill C, Deplorable Lord Kek who says:
video on YT “titled The Hammer and Scorecard , Part II, How Hammer and Scorecard Works”
This shows the Hammer and Scorecard program SWITCHING VOTES CAUGHT LIVE ON CNN!!!
count is:
Beshear (D): 673,948
Bevin (R):662,235
Hammer and Scorecard program switches to
Beshear (D): 674, 508
Bevin (R): 661, 675
Bevin loses 560 votes.
Caught on CNN Live: 25% of the difference between Dem to Rep was just washed out.
Perhaps there is a legitimate reason for this. They may be correcting an error, a typo, but it should be investigated and explained. How often have these silent corrections happened? Who is keeping watch?
How long will Youtube allow this to show?
UPDATE:
They have a witness and it’s the man who wrote the program. Dennis Montgomery is a hero…
There may be forensic evidence showing how the votes were changed. If that’s true, Mr Trump will have no problem in court.
Explained by Kirk Wiebe, Former NSA Senior Analyst.
h/t Deplorable Lord Kek
When I first read the headline for this article I was sceptical. By the time I got to the end of the article I had become even more worried about the US election process than I was already.
If it can be proved then the jig is up, but can it be proved?
252
A recount using 2 sets of counting machines with ballots kept together per precinct and entering each machine in a different order should detect all kinds of fraud, provided that there’s proper monitoring. One reads Trump heavy precincts first and the other reads Biden heavy precincts first. Final results are compared on a precinct by precinct basis. To the extent that data must be transferred, the accumulated statistics on both sides of the transaction must be cross checked. If the counting hardware is suspect, cross checking of selected results by hand may be necessary.
121
Three things
Checksums – if you alter data checksums will be different, this is designed to maintain packet integrity, and I’ll include hop count here as well
Signal Strength, assuming you have physically hacked into the network, and are luck enough to capture traffic with the voting info, any manipulation will change the signal strength.
Time to die/time to live flags will also need to be changed.
In short – a packet analyser will show you these as discrepancies, remember the internet is a multipoint and multihop design, with many actual paths between A and B.
If the voting data is compromised, then look to the incompetence of the network monitors first.
130
I think it is bigger than that.
183
Will be a heap of feathers if this cat is real.
“llanfar says:
8 November 2020 at 3:56 am
Please read the whole thread.
On Election night, Trump and his campaign team assembled in the Eisenhower Building just west if the White House to watch the results come in.
Know what is there?
A SCIF. pic.twitter.com/TvsYQiPKsV
— Tom Graham (@tom2badcat) November 7, 2020
”
https://chiefio.wordpress.com/2020/11/03/its-d-day/#comment-134531
SCIF = “Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility. (SCIF) The kind used by Army intelligence cyber security division. They were monitoring the fraud in real time.”
91
“Vote rigging: How to spot the tell-tale signs”
http://www.smalldeadanimals.com/index.php/2020/11/08/vote-rigging-how-to-spot-the-tell-tale-signs/#comments
50
‘The Hammer’ is the Stasi-like secret surveillance system created by CIA/NSA/FBI contractor-turned-whistleblower Dennis L. Montgomery for Obama’s intelligence chiefs, CIA Director John Brennan and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper.
The Hammer (HAMR) appears to be a massive supercomputer system that was used to eavesdrop on phone calls by deploying or “throwing” malicious plugins at targeted computers and smartphones to collect the intercepts and then send the data back to the master supercomputer framework.
https://milnenews.com/2019/05/26/the-truth-about-obamas-illicit-operation-hammer-and-all-involved/
I heard about this program years ago. Montgomery has been blowing the whistle for years. It was set up parallel to the official spy programme. They needed it because on the official computer all enquiries were logged. Om this computer NOTHING is logged.
A search on Dennis Montgomery and Dave Janda would be fruitful.
90
“WE’RE CALLING IT! TRUMP WON AGAIN”
https://richardsonpost.com/howellwoltz/18787/trump-won-again/
80
Great Ian.
10
Biden has been widely acknowledged as the president elect. Time square is pumping to Biden’s victory. The press is fawning. Both Rudd and Turnbull are beside themselves with grins from ear-to-ear. It is viewed as a great victory for globalism.
Australian press is saying Biden will come at ScoMo with a big stick over lack of response to Climate Change! If there is no Cover vaccine by the time he takes office, the USA will be well into 4 figures for daily deaths. That will keep him busy until a vaccine comes. I doubt he will have as easy path as Trump experienced with Covid should Kamala arrange for him to contract the virus.
Meanwhile Trump is on the golf course having fun. As far as I can tell none of the legal challenges have legs. That said, there were some strange happenings in the election count. Michigan was a surprise to me – Trump well ahead then Biden given it the next time I looked – strange.
54
“Rebel Alliance Post-It Notes…”
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/11/07/rebel-alliance-post-it-notes/
30
My posts going in at quick succession. Three already today. Too many things coming out. I suspect the Reps were hit by a shockwave they didn’t expect on Election night. They weren’t prepared as much as they should have been. Now they have a lot of catch up to do.
100
So True. On all counts.
However, regardless of the witless Reps, was Trump and his Team ready? He had been warning for weeks ahead about the dangers of Mail in Ballots. A lot of evidence seems to have come out already, but not from the Trump Team. They have notified about lawsuits but not yet given any evidence. Don’t let on when you don’t yet have to. Is it a Strategy?
31
Interesting video on the US election vote tampering …
https://youtu.be/ficae6x1Q5A
21
OK then; let’s start with this…
President Trump has been dealing with rats and snakes inside his administration ever since he took office. As everybody here knows, it takes time to do the housecleaning necessary to rid his administration of the Obama holdovers, as well as ton of the Bush people, believe it or don’t. (State Department is a different issue. It is filled with career bureaucrats that like to think they are actually a separate branch of government. They have also thought and acted this way since forever. But that’s another issue altogether.)
There were key people outside of this administration who have been with him from the start. Rep. Devin Nunes has latched on to what is really going on both inside and outside to the Trump administration. He also has a few key Senators in key positions (ie Chairmen of very powerful committees) that are very much on his side and are appalled at what has been happening to him and his administration.
He then brought Ric Grenell back home from being his Ambassador to Germany to put him in a very key position in the intelligence community (Acting DNI…Director of National Intelligence). I’m quite sure that Ric has recommended to the president some very important to people who he could trust. I’m quite sure some are very well placed in the Intelligence Community.
So now we get to Hammer and Scorecard and Ric Grenell.
I take it as a given that Ric knows all about HnS.
So now, why do you think they were in the Eisenhower building that has that secured room? I would imagine watching the key states and their returns, right along side with Rick and a few other people in the know. Do you think they weren’t giving President Trump a blow by blow what was happening?
PDJT always knows more than the average bear…
*****
(BTW, be sure to watch the ~1hr, 40min movie “The Plot Against the President”. If you have Amazon Prime you can rent it for $3.99 USD. I know for a fact there are other platforms where you can do the same, at least here in the US. It will REALLY give you an idea of the monumental opposition he’s been facing in his first four years and how heroic Devin Nunes was and still is.)
140
Ah, so that’s what they called it, “Scorecard”.
This isn’t the first time it’s been used in a US election. The last time, a group of whitehat hackers shut it down at the last moment and locked the Deep State operatives out of their own computers, which is why Hitlery lost. Remember the video of Bill bouncing with glee at the Javitz Center? Yeah, he’d just been informed that Hitlery was falling behind by a large margin, but it was being handled by the Deep State. When she unexpectedly lost, she freaked out, attacked Robbie Mook, started drinking, had to be sedated and that’s why John Podesta had to go out on-stage to address the crowd. Hitlery had to be carry-dragged to her limousine. LOL
I guess this time around, the Deep State were successful in keeping out the whitehats. I don’t know, I didn’t participate this time.
50
Laws for thee but not for me. Does anyone else think it’s ok for us to interfere in foreign elections, when its so dicusting when they do it to us. Why was this program developed in the first place?
80
BTW, Jo.
You might want to check to see if you website is getting DDOS’d… I’m only getting ~6 kbps down while loading your site. Seems someone might not like this article. LOL
20
If you want to see Scorecard in action, in real time, watch these two clips:
560 votes switch in split second
https://twitter.com/i/status/1325626714614079489
19,958 votes change in a second
https://twitter.com/A_Blossom4USA/status/1325500457331138567
It happens so fast, you have to see it frame by frame.
Talk about stealing elections… Unreal.
53
holy moly. this is incredible. so much evidence! everywhere you look, evidence! evidence of gullibility. evidence of stupidity. evidence of insanity. evidence of hate and ignorance. it’s everywhere you look!
you’re all pretty awful people.
37
Said with all the tolerance and logic we expect of a Democrat.
170
If you apply Benford’s Law to the progressive vote tally, you can easily detect fraud.
And low and below… It shows fraud in at least WI, PA, IL, all of the fraud happening after the counting was stopped on the first night.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/6493c58f237414a650e0e174d93f7a5bc78d2ac20049960d6276c38ab0c362c4.png
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/5b851958a1c4d9d6604abd23d67be827878962f70b4d27cb65b126ac091e57f0.png
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/379e9233b28ac799b57f73b898f170301dc8df3da3d5129938ed7ce5bbc593fd.png
Bidens distirbution is just straight up extordinatrely unlikely – basically seldom. Not even 1 in 1 million, we are talking “A won the lotto 100 times in a row!” numbers.
The counts are either straight up lies, or the Biden had a large number of sequential votes dumped onto his talley.
40
Another interesting fact; the Democrats have lost 5-6 seats in Congress and don’t look like controlling the Senate. Interesting how so many voters “switched” between Biden for President and voting for the Republicans in the 2 houses. The “Blue Wave” predicted by the (incompetent) polls has not come to fruition.
50
Good news.
00
Sidney Powell, why The Hammer is not a woo-woo conspiracy theory.
She replies, “Well, there’s multiple sources that this exists – an absolute confirmation of it. It’s even moved off its original site into a private company…But Obama, Biden, Brennan, Clapper, Comey, Mueller – all know about it; helped create it and know how to use it against the American people.
Audio broadcast from USAF Lt Gen Thomas McInerney (Ret) spells out what (will) is happened …
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/72983-2/
30
Tom, keen to hear this but the link appears broken ?
21
[…] Adding fuel to this bonfire of a story is the credible accusation a CIA program, “Hammer & Scorecard”, designed to interfere with foreign elections was used in real-time in the 2020 election. […]
20
I respect Sidney Powell a lot as an attorney, but I think she’s jumped the gun on this story.
Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency Director Chris Krebs says that Hammer and Scorecard is a hoax. They can certainly spy on almost anything, but I am VERY skeptical about alterations in the network traffic going undetected.
https://twitter.com/CISAKrebs/status/1325188644966117376
Also, the man who is the “whistle blower” for this story, Dennis Montgomery, was busted years ago for falsely claiming that software he created could decipher terrorist communications embedded in Al-Jazeera broadcasts.
“How a Reno casino con man became a respected defense contractor”
https://youtu.be/oWPTbqm5Hzs
“Court Tosses CIA Contractor’s Appeal Over Con-Man Label”
https://www.courthousenews.com/court-tosses-cia-contractors-appeal-con-man-label/
I’m not happy with the apparent shenanigans regarding the integrity of the election results from some of these Democrat political machines, but I think a word of caution would be prudent in this case. The illegal behavior described by Rudy Giuliani in Philadelphia is bad enough without going for sketchy claims like this.
32
We’ve heard a lot since Nov 3 about things that undermined the integrity of the election vote.
As with anything else, eventually suspicions must be backed up with evidence.
Consider the SGT Report video and, led by the narrator, see if you can pick up visual evidence of vote switching/vote subtraction.
Something mathematically impossible happened: the vote tally decreased for one candidate.
I should say, it APPEARED to decrease.
Now, this is a governor’s race (KY), not the presidential race.
If true, it means there’s a way to vote switch and/or delete votes in any race.
But is it true?
I DuckDuckGoed to see if CNN had an explanation and found none.
The only other possibility that came to mind is image modification.
That’s easy with a still photograph; I’m not sure about a video.
Specifically, is the gold rectangle that presents the vote tallies for each candidate generated by CNN?
Or was it added by someone else to create the appearance of vote modification?
This question could have easily been addressed, but that requires that every possibility be nailed down, or you have no case.
The deficiency I see in the narrator’s presentation is that he did not show the ribbon tally change for Bevin to what he claimed was an altered vote.
The ribbon is the strip at the bottom of the screen that shows candidates, party affiliation and vote tally.
That ribbon is definitely generated by CNN; every U.S. network does it this way.
Had that vote tally for Bevin dropped as it did in the gold rectangle, then we could conclude with certainty that votes had been subtracted from Bevin.
But without that, the allegation of vote subtraction remains unproven:
/ UNLESS It can be proved that the gold rectangle belongs to CNN.
/ UNLESS further footage is provided showing that the ribbon tally for Bevin changes to match the gold rectangle tally.
We have to be very careful with what’s being presented as evidence.
Every question must be answered.
I’m not calling this narrator dishonest.
I’m just saying he did not to my mind rule out every possibility except the one he claims happened.
30
That;s the problem though. There are reasons this might happen, and it would take a full investigation to figure it out. But no one in the mainstream media is even asking the question or demanding to know.
And if Hanner and Scorecard was used, the changes would not make it to TV, they’d appear in the centres that collect the results from the counties, and they’d only show if someone also knew what was sent from each county.
20
We’ve heard a lot since Nov 3 about things that undermined the integrity of the election vote.
As with anything else, eventually suspicions must be backed up with evidence.
Consider the SGT Report video and, led by the narrator, see if you can pick up visual evidence of vote switching/vote subtraction.
Something mathematically impossible happened: the vote tally decreased for one candidate.
I should say, it APPEARED to decrease.
Now, this is a governor’s race (KY), not the presidential race.
If true, it means there’s a way to vote switch and/or delete votes in any race.
But is it true?
I DuckDuckGoed to see if CNN had an explanation and found none.
The only other possibility that came to mind is image modification.
That’s easy with a still photograph; I’m not sure about a video.
Specifically, is the gold rectangle that presents the vote tallies for each candidate generated by CNN?
Or was it added by someone else to create the appearance of vote modification?
This question could have easily been addressed, but that requires that every possibility be nailed down, or you have no case.
The deficiency I see in the narrator’s presentation is that he did not show the ribbon tally change for Bevin to what he claimed was an altered vote.
The ribbon is the strip at the bottom of the screen that shows candidates, party affiliation and vote tally.
That ribbon is definitely generated by CNN; every U.S. network does it this way.
Had that vote tally for Bevin dropped as it did in the gold rectangle, then we could conclude with certainty that votes had been subtracted from Bevin.
But without that, the allegation of vote subtraction remains unproven:
/ UNLESS It can be proved that the gold rectangle belongs to CNN.
/ UNLESS further footage is provided showing that the ribbon tally for Bevin changes to match the gold rectangle tally.
We have to be very careful with what’s being presented as evidence.
Every question must be answered.
I’m not calling this narrator dishonest.
I’m just saying he did not to my mind rule out every possibility except the one he claims happened.
00
you have to know that Dominion Voting is used all over the world for elections…is this how we have simultaneouslys around the world governments that are willing all of them : to vaccinate the world against their will, quarantine dissenters and move to digital currency with no debate?
41
Can anyone confirm if the Dominion software used in Australia? The AEC website mentions a Pilot study using Dominion.
3.12Dominion Voting Systems (a Canadian company that sells ballot paper scanners)9 noted the issues with large scale manual counting of ballot papers and the advantages of electronic counting:
https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Joint/Electoral_Matters/2016Election/Third_Interim_Report/section?id=committees%2Freportjnt%2F024070%2F24649
00
How would one go about trying to detect if electronic voter fraud was utilized in a specific house race. For example there’s a story going around about the presidential race and votes disappearing for Trump in Virginia (https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/captured-real-time-moment-virginia-512-took-169000-votes-off-state-totals/). Well there are some questions about the Virginia House seats in the 4th and 7th congressional district races where both GOP candidates were winning until in one case well past 11 pm the race flipped to the Democrat winning by a larger margin than what was expected (VA 4th district), the other GOP candidate was winning with a huge margin going into Wednesday morning, by Wednesday night he was only up by 700 votes and by Thursday he was losing by 5000 votes (VA 7th district). In the 1st case, I’m wondering about electronic voter fraud, and in the 2nd case a combination of fake absentee ballots and electronic voter fraud. But how does one go about researching, investigating and determining if shenanigans with a hammer/scorecard type software was used. Is it possible? Where can someone go back and look at the time stamped changing of the election tallying numbers by precinct or county or something? Is there an expert that can be enlisted? I’m sure they are all working on the important swing states right now, rather than Virginia which is already in the bag for Biden. Thanks.
31
[…] d to interfere in foreign elections being used in the US now? […]
01