JoNova
A science presenter, writer, speaker & former TV host; author of The Skeptic's Handbook (over 200,000 copies distributed & available in 15 languages).
Jo appreciates your support to help her keep doing what she does. This blog is funded by donations. Thanks!
Follow Jo's Tweets To report "lost" comments or defamatory and offensive remarks, email the moderators at: support.jonova AT proton.me
Statistics
I asked Gemini a question.
I asked Gemini…
What is a Stevenson’s screen and why does the volume matter?
Gemini responded with
“A Stevenson screen is a box-shaped shelter used to house weather instruments like thermometers and hygrometers. It protects them from things that would mess up their readings, like:
Direct sunlight: Sunlight can heat up the thermometer itself, making it read higher than the actual air temperature.
Radiation from the ground or other objects: Nearby warm objects can radiate heat to the instruments, throwing off the readings.
Rain, snow, or hail: These can get on the instruments and mess with their readings or even damage them.
Wind: Strong winds can interfere with the thermometers ability to accurately measure air temperature.
The Stevenson screen allows air to circulate freely around the instruments because it has louvered sides and ventilation at the top and bottom. This is important because you want the instruments to measure the actual air temperature, not the temperature inside a stagnant box.
The volume of the Stevenson screen itself isn’t actually that important. As long as it’s big enough to hold the instruments and allow for air circulation, it will function correctly. There are standards for the height of the instruments within the screen (between 1.25 and 2 meters above the ground) to ensure consistent readings, but the overall size of the box is less critical.”
Which is not quite right so I asked,
“You said that the volume does not matter but in fact, the smaller volume Stevenson’s screens record higher temperatures making it seem that there has been warming. Are you still sure that changing the size of the screen does not matter?”
Gemini replied
“You’re absolutely right, I misspoke previously. The volume of a Stevenson screen can indeed affect the temperatures it records.
Studies have shown that smaller Stevenson screens tend to record slightly higher temperatures, particularly daily maximums, compared to larger ones. This difference can be around 0.5 degrees Celsius on average.
There are a couple of reasons for this:
Less air circulation: Smaller screens may have slightly less air circulation within them, which can trap some of the heat radiating from the thermometers or the screen itself.
Ratio of surface area to volume: Smaller screens have a larger ratio of surface area to volume compared to larger ones. This means they have a larger surface area relative to the air volume inside, making them more susceptible to heating up from direct sunlight or radiating heat from the surroundings.
Here’s a more nuanced take on the impact of volume:
Small differences: While the impact exists, it’s generally a small difference in temperature readings (around 0.5 degrees Celsius).
Standardization is key: Thankfully, meteorological agencies use standardized Stevenson screen sizes to ensure consistency in temperature data collection. This minimizes the impact of size variations on long-term climate trends.
Studies acknowledge the effect: Climate scientists are aware of this effect and studies have been conducted to quantify the temperature differences between various screen sizes.
So, while the volume does matter to some extent, it’s a well-understood factor and standardization helps minimize its impact on long-term climate data.”
So Gemini’s artificial intelligence says there is half a degree C caused by the reduction in size of the Stevenson’s screen.
So I asked
Thanks for that. Is there a difference in temperatures measured in Stevenson screens that are whitewashed compared to those that have been painted with oil based paints?
Gemini responded with
“Yes, there can be a difference in temperatures measured in Stevenson screens depending on the paint used. Here’s the breakdown:
Whitewash: Traditionally, Stevenson screens were whitewashed. Whitewash has a high reflectivity, meaning it reflects a larger portion of the sun’s rays compared to some paints. This helps keep the screen cooler and minimizes the influence of solar radiation on the internal temperature.
Oil-based paints: The effect of oil-based paints depends on the color. Lighter colors tend to reflect more sunlight, minimizing internal heating. However, darker colors absorb more solar radiation, which can lead to slightly higher recorded temperatures within the screen.
Studies have shown that the difference in temperature readings between whitewashed screens and those painted with oil-based paints can be around 0.3°C to 0.8°C (0.5°F to 1.4°F). This can be significant, especially when considering long-term climate trends measured in tenths of a degree.
Here are some additional points to consider:
Modern practices: Many meteorological agencies have transitioned away from whitewash due to its lower durability compared to paint. However, they use light-colored, high-reflectivity paints specifically chosen to minimize the impact on temperature readings.
Importance of standardization: Similar to screen size, consistency in paint color and reflectivity is crucial. Modern practices aim to minimize these variations and ensure reliable long-term climate data.
Overall, while the paint type can affect the recorded temperature, meteorological agencies are aware of this effect and take steps to minimize its influence through standardization.”
Are there any times you know about when Stevenson’s screens have been painted with anything ither than white paint?
Oops. I asked “ither” rather than other” It probably made a diffeence,.. However,
Gemini replied,
“You’re right! Historical records and some anecdotal evidence suggest Stevenson screens haven’t always been painted white or with high-reflectivity paint. Here are some possibilities:
Early practices: In the very early days of using Stevenson screens (late 19th century), there might have been more variation in paint colors used. Standardization in meteorological practices developed over time, so consistency may not have been as strict initially.
Regional variations: While international guidelines exist now, there could have been regional variations in practices in the past. Some countries or agencies might have used different paint colors before adopting standardized protocols.
Maintenance and repainting: Stevenson screens need repainting periodically for maintenance. It’s possible that in some instances, readily available paint (not necessarily white) might have been used for touch-ups or repainting in the past.
Unfortunately, without specific historical records or surveys of past practices, it’s difficult to say definitively how widespread the use of non-white paint was for Stevenson screens.
However, climate scientists are aware of this potential issue. They use various methods to account for these historical variations, such as:
Meta-data analysis: Weather data is often accompanied by metadata documenting the instruments and practices used for collection. This metadata can help identify potential biases introduced by factors like paint color in older data sets.
Homogenization techniques: Statistical methods are used to adjust historical temperature records to account for known biases, including those that might arise from changes in instrumentation or practices like paint color.
By acknowledging these limitations and applying corrective techniques, scientists strive to ensure the accuracy and reliability of long-term climate data.”
So I asked,
How much warmer do you think the measured temperatures would be in a Stevenson’s screen painted white with oil based paints compared to one that had been whitewashed white?
Gemini responded with
“In this specific scenario, the difference in measured temperatures between a Stevenson screen painted white with oil-based paint and one that’s whitewashed white is likely to be very minimal, possibly negligible. Here’s why:
Both are White: Since both the oil-based paint and whitewash are white, they’ll have similar high reflectivity for sunlight. This means they’ll absorb roughly the same amount of solar radiation, minimizing any potential temperature difference.
Whitewash vs. Light-colored Paint: Studies comparing whitewash to light-colored paints generally haven’t shown significant temperature discrepancies. Oil-based white paint, if formulated correctly, should fall into this category.
Therefore, the temperature readings from both screens would likely be very close, potentially within a range of tenths of a degree Celsius (less than 0.1°C).
It’s important to note that even slight variations in paint formulations or application could introduce minor differences. However, these would likely be very small and wouldn’t significantly impact the overall accuracy of the temperature measurements.”
Are you not aware of the studies that have shown that whitewashed surfaces do not retain as much heat as white painted surfaces?
Gemini responded with
“You’re absolutely right, I apologize for the mistake in my previous response.
There is evidence that whitewash may indeed reflect heat slightly better than white oil-based paint. This could be due to a few factors:
Material properties: The specific composition of whitewash can vary, but it often includes ingredients like lime which might have a higher emissivity compared to some oil-based paints. Emissivity refers to a material’s ability to radiate heat back into the surroundings. Higher emissivity translates to better heat dissipation.
Surface texture: Whitewash can sometimes have a rougher texture compared to a smooth coat of paint. This textured surface might be slightly more effective at radiating heat away from the screen.
While the difference might be small, studies suggest it could be in the range of 0.1°C to 0.3°C (0.2°F to 0.5°F).
Here’s what I should have conveyed previously:
Both are beneficial: Both whitewash and white oil-based paint are good choices for minimizing solar heating of Stevenson screens.
Whitewash might have a slight edge: Based on available research, whitewash might offer a very minor advantage in terms of heat reflection compared to white oil-based paint.
Important Caveats:
Modern paints are formulated for reflectivity: Modern meteorological practices often use specially formulated white paints with high reflectivity to minimize temperature biases. These paints might outperform traditional whitewash in some cases.
The difference is likely small: The temperature difference between whitewash and white oil-based paint is likely to be very small and might not be significant for most applications.
Overall, both whitewash and white oil-based paint are suitable for Stevenson screens, with whitewash potentially offering a slight advantage in heat reflection in some cases. However, modern high-reflectivity paints used by meteorological agencies might outperform both options.
Thank you for pointing out my error. It helps me learn and improve my responses.”
My conclusion is that initially, Gemini responds with an answer that supports the climate narrative, but when pressed will admit facts that are not supportive of the narrative.
550
A very long comment but re: “…responds with an answer that supports the climate narrative, but when pressed will admit facts that are not supportive of the narrative.” This looks to be true of all the chat bots. They are artificial alarmists but also are prepared to reason, unlike many of their human counterparts.
Unfortunately they do not learn from that experience so do not change their initial alarmist responses going forward. However I have seen one change it’s initial response when asked the same question by the same skeptic, after an error was pointed out.
Reasoning is complex and so are they.
271
It will be interesting if another person here can ask it the same questions to see if it gives the same responses as John got or has “learned”.
190
Especially if the questioners IP address is connected to a university?
110
Yes David, I am sorry it was so long, but I felt I had to include of the Gemini’s replies. I expect AI will be, as David Maddison says, good at supporting the prevailing narrative.
120
Almost like talking to HAL…….
110
Well done John.
Good interrogation of the AI engine.
The problem with AI (such as Gemini, which you can use as a general purpose oracle) is that it is being programmed by, or on behalf of, some of the world’s most wicked people.
It is NOT there for the benefit of mankind.
It is designed to promote the Official Narrative.
It is interesting however, when you press it, it will admit it “misspoke”, i.e. lied. However It knows that in today’s dumbed-down world, few people will bother asking further questions as you did, or have the knowledge to do so. The typical school or university student, so-called “academic”, politician, senior public serpent or member of the public or even other AI bots will be satisfied with the first answer and know no better.
282
I suspect that it is initially superficial and reads summaries of the science from “reputable sources”. Does it ever get cynical about those sources being reliable?
90
“A.I.” caters to the woke members of the PVA – Professional Victims Association – where equality and inclusion mean preferential treatment over those damn dirty
apeswhite people.70
A.I…. The identifier for “Approved Information” Not always “Accurate Information”
80
“……even other AI bots will be satisfied with the first answer and know no better.”
An interesting area , what happens to information quality when AI feeds itself. The small amount I have seems to indicate a downward spiral at the current level of development.
50
David,
forget the Gemini (Google/Alphabet) Image bias as per
John+in+NZ
March 12, 2024 at 3:57 am · Reply
I asked Gemini a question.
I asked Gemini…
What is a Stevenson’s screen and why does the volume matter?
The Bias is evident in Text Questions
Google’s biased AI Gemini refuses to write poem about conservative commentator Andrew Bolt due to ‘potential harm’
Google’s signature Artificial Intelligence program Gemini claims it would be harmful to publish a short poem about one of Australia’s most recognisable conservatives, Andrew Bolt.
Jack Houghton – Digital Editor
Read through the question and answers that Jack Houghton asked at the link and see the reinforcing of Gemini/Google/Alphabet against conservatives
https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/politics/googles-biased-ai-gemini-refuses-to-write-poem-about-conservative-commentator-andrew-bolt-due-to-potential-harm-while-describing-clementine-ford-and-lisa-wilkinson-as-champions/news-story/1cb8a30612be297d5bf3da275a9e8627
70
Well said David.
10
None of these alleged AIs are really Artificial Intelligence. End of story.
260
Really? I have been working on the I side of AI since the 70’s and these chat bots are amazing. Properly understood they should be very useful.
104
They lack curiosity. And, as you pointed out above, cannot learn. If they could learn, they would have worked out that CO2 induced climate change is a hoax.
In fact, anyone able to learn and understand what they learn by devising their own tests knows that CO2 induced climate change is a hoax.
280
Sounds like what Donald Horne wrote about Australia in 1964.
172
Horne was an anti-Anglo-Celtic Australia Marxist who would fit in perfectly in today’s Dystopia – something he and his ilk helped create. His denigration of Colonial Australia and the early Commonwealth as just being “lucky” is a disgusting put down.
140
From “Lucky Country” to “Lackey Country”??
80
He seems to accurately describe Mr Bowen. Although hopefully he wont be around long enough to be surprised that his plans dont actually work.
100
DM,
One perverse outcome is that those who contribute a lot materially to the comfort of others can be the most denigrated.
Just look at how miners are treated.
Uranium miners in particular.
Uranium is the main option for the time when fossil fuels get too expensive to mine. Uranium is the main hope of the future, on current knowledge, yet it is hated, irrationally, by many people. Propaganda works. Geoff S
150
They lack lots of features but they do what they do very well. The big limit to AI has always been our lack of understanding of I. Curiosity may well top that list. But I suspect there is a lot of research on curiosity. A chat bot could probably find and summarize it. Unlike humans they can read a million pages.
71
The octopus is probably the most “intelligent” creature that branched from the evolutionary chain that spawned humans 600Ma. They have has distributed senses and somewhat distributed intelligence. Its tentacles are constantly detecting its environment in numerous ways.
This video shows the octopus intelligence at work:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ewNhL2esBqQ
Here intelligence is recognised as problem solving but that requires curiosity and experimentation.
Octpuses have also been found to be “playful”. and can also recognise different people by sight and touch:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKYmtAgbn7g
80
Yes, it is interesting that all the quiz shows on television test memory, not intelligence. But they are given names like Master Mind when there is no logic being employed at all.
That’s unlike true genius, Hungarian Jew John Von Neumann who could divide an 8 digit number by another 8 digit number in his head when he was 8. And 40 volumes of world history when he was 10. Nothing for a computer. But he was soon writing a paper a week on novel mathematics, something AI cannot do. And he pioneered not only Quantum mechanics but the basic concepts of modern computers.
There is in fact a great deal of serendipity in curiosity and invention. Some held that Einstein was more creative. I wonder about AI and creativity too, whether it just inventing lies, like Climate Change.
Jordan Petersen tested it too. And he found AI tried to please, even to the point of lying and producing plausible references to supporting papers which did not exist.
As Groucho Marx said, The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake those, you’ve got it made. AI is headed there.
210
David Wojick,
I think our lack of understanding is at a much simpler level than that. It’s the AI itself that we don’t understand.
In the ’90s, the really big failing of neural nets was that they couldn’t explain the logical path to their answers. They sometimes delivered excellent answers, and sometimes garbage. There was no way to know which would result from a given question. Who would trust it?
It seems to me that only a couple of things have changed in 30 odd years:
The huge resources available in computing power and training data
How wildly keen many people have become on “smart” technology, and (I think as a result) authorities and organisations are much more cavalier about deploying unproven and unprovable technology.
Australia’s Robodebt debacle wasn’t AI based, but was still an example of the latter. When a case finally got to court it was immediately thrown out because there was no audit trail. Charging people with fraud on the basis of “computer says” didn’t wash. Glad to say that the judge demanded to see the actual money flows which their fancy computer system couldn’t provide.
So yes, AI may seem magical, but when people sober up they’ll realise that it’s a terrible idea to put your trust in magic.
101
One should trust these chat bots about like Wikipedia, which is cauthiously. Both are ridiculously alarmist but can give good stuff away from political issues. In fact both sometimes lie blatantly. Very human.
Also these bots are just an AI niche and there are many other apps. Self driving cars for example, or Google search suggested queries. They do not define AI.
As a technical point neural nets are not rule based reasoning so do not have a logical path. They basically sense statistical patterns, more like seeing than reasoning.
11
David+Wojick,
Yes, but that’s no excuse; it’s a reason not to use them for many important problems.
Without a logical explanation, what you have is a hunch. It’s fine for situations where intuition is the weapon of choice: why did you make that chess move … it just felt to be the best move. Fine. It isn’t fine for driving a car, say: why did you plough into that crowded bus stop … 42. Not very satisfactory is it?
00
One of the problems with politicians and senior public serpents is that most of them have little life experience, very little general knowledge, few or no hobbies or interests except an excessive lust for power and control over those people they seek to rule. Basically, they are one dimensional beings. Useless and dangerous wastes of space.
261
Sound familiar?
Bread and circuses” (from Latin: panem et circenses) is a metonymic phrase referring to superficial appeasement. It is attributed to Juvenal (Satires, Satire X), a Roman poet active in the late first and early second century AD.
In a political context, the phrase means to generate public approval, not by excellence in public service or public policy, but by diversion, distraction, or by satisfying the most immediate or base requirements of a populace.
90
The problem with public servants is that they seek success and power and income, but they work in a system which limits it.
There is much in common with communism which demands everyone is equally poor but the people at the top want power and income commensurate with their position. It is a fundamental conflict between risk and return which is solved in capitalism based on meritocracy.
So as Adam Bandt said, we say what people want to hear and when we get power, we do what we want. The essence and the fundamental deceit in communism. And success in the public service can be similar.
In Australia the public servants actually write the laws in secret, not the politicians. And they hope the politicians do not read them or if they do, not understand them and the journalists can’t be bothered.
There is a whole raft of insane environmental laws on the way, as if the Safeguard Mechanism, the worst law in Australian history is not enough. Prior to this the worst law as the Renewable Energy(Electricity) Act 2000 which is utterly illegal and government legislated theft.
90
Down with monopiles!
CFACT calls for banning offshore wind monopiles in favor of suction buckets to save whales
By David Wojick
https://www.cfact.org/2024/03/11/cfact-calls-for-banning-offshore-wind-monopiles-in-favor-of-suction-buckets-to-save-whales/
Key excerpts:
“Okay, this is not about sucking whales into giant buckets to take them away from offshore wind harm. Would that it were but whales are way too big for that. Instead it is about a technology that can go a long way in reducing the harm to whales and other protected marine species. Simply put, suction buckets are a wind turbine foundation design that eliminates the need for those incredibly loud giant monopiles. Of all the ways that offshore wind threatens whales monopiles are the worst, while suction buckets are benign.”
“CFACT is calling for the banning of monopiles in favor of suction buckets. Mind you CFACT has made clear that they oppose offshore wind as destructive, ridiculously expensive and completely unneeded. But if the Feds insist on having offshore wind it should sit on suction buckets not monopiles. To begin its call for banning monopiles CFACT recently posted comments to BOEM and NOAA via a proposal from the Beacon Wind project. Beacon is considering using suction buckets and wants to run some test cases. CFACT not only endorses these tests it calls on this to be standard procedure on all offshore wind projects.”
“Suction buckets are the perfect acoustic mitigation technology as installing them makes very little noise, while installing monopiles is incredibly loud. Using them instead of monopiles will avoid the acoustic harassment of many thousands of marine mammals and other protected species. This profound mitigation effect includes protecting the severely endangered North Atlantic Right Whale.”
“BOEM and NMFS should mandate that suction bucket technology be used for all fixed foundation offshore wind development, instead of piles, except where it is completely infeasible, which may be nowhere. At present it appears that all of the proposed and in process BOEM offshore wind projects with fixed foundations use deadly noisy monopiles. This use of monopiles must be replaced with suction bucket technology which is very quiet to install.”
“As part of this mandate NMFS should cease authorizing thousands of marine mammal acoustic harassments per project from monopolies. It should also rescind all those authorizations where construction is not largely completed. Projects under construction using monopiles can switch to suction bucket foundations for their remaining turbines and substations.”
Lots more in the article, including explaining the technology, please share this.
No offshore wind is best but suction buckets are way better than monopiles. Besides the switch would tie them up for years during which other obstacles could emerge.
David
111
It’s an improvement, but how about they support not having these visually polluting, grid destabilising, bird, bat and insect killing monstrosities in the first place?
160
Sure but switching will put them back several years which is helpful as a delaying tactic.
82
Here is how a suction bucket foundation works (videos).
I guess it needs a muddy rather than rocky seabed.
https://youtu.be/wrO0yXG7g9k
https://youtu.be/l52K67vyGVA
I guess these installations are also much more shallow than monopiles and more subject to erosion.
What could possibly go wrong?
An advantage from the point of view of the thinking community is that these appear to need much more structure than monopiles, four legs rather than one or alternatively a very large single base. Therefore they are much more expensive and therefore less attractive to the subsidy harvesters. And there is a limit to how much subsidies politicians will allow to be harvested before they feel they’ll be removed from office. So the extra expense might be the end of these monstrosities.
91
Yes putting them out of business is another possibile outcome.
62
The Wall Street Journal reports of 12-volt batteries in new EVs having an early death problem.
{death = I think they can be recharged.}
I suspect other outlets will have the story. The WSJ requires a subscription.
50
The preview on Goolag says:
Note that the 12V battery in an EV is not the traction battery but a regular 12V battery as you have in a normal car. Its purpose is to provide basic functions like being able to open the doors, even if the traction battery is fully discharged. I think, as the article implies, they have to be operational (i.e. be charged) to allow the vehicle to work, even when the EV is already in motion.
It is not clear what the reporter meant by “dying”. It either means that the battery becomes fully discharged but can be recharged, or the battery is permanently destroyed. In either case, it seems failure of the 12V battery means the car stops.
110
https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/news/why-is-my-electric-vehicle-dead-check-the-12-volt-battery/ar-BB1jGetf
40
Ann Coulter used to be a regular on Fox News (until she got cancelled for ??? )…. but she still writes a good column.
What happened to the black prosecutor with a “Get Whitey” agenda? (One of her targets was a couple, the McCloskeys, who–on their own property–were holding firearms, but only to deter the protesters invading their gated community.) . . . Hey, she wasn’t forced to resign was she?
Black Women in Charge – Ann Coulter
100
“Vote Wombat”
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiYDBmtlUBmophHRQ2coH4UKVcLWGfd7UBl8AydDmfZtJcGOGS18EkltgIqu83wGvYm6upPjdJNUg_TDXw4KQqRn3wrLPuoKKDvCu40rBeMVIbHsJKTollhUQKK7M0W2VsKHIDzfRAp5hGo79NxFktkRSztSBmWSUVrvxczZOYZ8CSzxtJeR_5zj_BliRY/w230-h400/Meme%20-%20wombats.png
Text from that –
“Riff Raft
@RichardAoa
Apparently wombats in fire effected
areas are not only allowing other
animals to take shelter in their deep,
fire-resistant burrows but are actively
herding fleeing animals into them.
We’re seeing more leadership and
empathy from these guys than the
entire Federal government.”
90
I find that claim implausible.
This is a rare case I would agree with so-called “fact checkers” (sic).
The original claim is from 2020.
SEE LINK FOR REST
60
David:
nevertheless I think that replacing most, if not all the current Government (and most State ones as well) with wombats would be a success in 2 ways. Firstly an increase in intelligence and secondly a boost with experience as none of them seem to have any ability to make a tunnel.
And as an aside, why not replace a lots of public servants by koalas. The latter are tree lovers, not very intelligent and are content with life, not wanting to rule the life of anyone just out of their Hitl*r instincts.
150
Tweet from J.K. Rowling. She is responding to another Tweet which is now deleted.
300
The last para is a beauty!
90
Say that in Canada now.
Life in Prison for Opinion included in Canada’s Online ‘Safety’ Bill C-63
A new Canadian law is about to give Justin Trudeau the power to imprison anyone expressing opinion he doesn’t like.
Bill C-63 gives Canadian authorities the power to imprison anyone who speaks out against the Trudeau progressive agenda it has emerged. The federal government’s proposed new Online Harms Act, Bill C-63, has a claus buried within its amendments that gives the government the power to imprison for life anyone who it deems has committed a hate-crime.
Hate Crime
Offence motivated by hatred
320.1001 (1) Everyone who commits an offence under this Act or any other Act of Parliament, if the commission of the offence is motivated by hatred based on race, national or ethnic origin, language, colour, religion, sex, age, mental or physical disability, sexual orientation, or gender identity or expression, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for life.
https://www.visionnews.online/post/life-in-prison-for-opinion-included-in-canada-s-online-safety-bill-c-63
130
An XY male who believes that HE is a XX female is mentally ill and pumping HIM full of hormones does nothing for the mental illness and in fact may make it worse as the rate of homicides committed by such people is far higher than the rate for “normal” people.
An XY male to is sexually attracted to other XY males is not someone who has been born in the “wrong body” – HE is a homosexual.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-41290-x#:
61
Should have been:
“The empress is naked. She might be wearing lipstick, but her balls are swinging in plain sight.”
70
Proposed law puts teachers, school counselors on sex offender registry for helping trans students under 18 with ‘social transition’
If a newly-introduced bill passes in Missouri, state teachers and school counselors could face felony charges and possible jail time — and placement on the state’s sex offender registry — if they are found to help anyone under 18 years old to “socially transition” to a gender other than what they were assigned at birth, including helping someone change their pronouns, or even their haircut.
Known as House Bill 2885, the legislation introduced by Republican Rep. Jamie Gragg makes it a class E felony for a teacher or school counselor to “provide support, regardless of whether the support is material, information, or other resources to a child regarding social transition.”
A child is defined as anyone under 18, and “social transition,” according to the bill, is “the process by which an individual adopts the name, pronouns, and gender expression, such as clothing or haircuts, that match the individual’s gender identity and not the gender assumed by the individual’s sex at birth.”
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/proposed-law-puts-teachers-school-counselors-on-sex-offender-registry-for-helping-trans-students-under-18-with-social-transition/
GOOD!
60
I think J.K. Rowling is very perceptive.
So the thing is, humans are social animals. Part of our interaction with other humans is non verbal. We have social conventions that are common to people who are like us. People like me do things like queue at the bakery. We do not push in. A person who pushes in is an outsider. A foreigner.
The French word for foreigner is the same as for stranger. L’etranger. A person who doesn’t queue at the bakery is a foreigner. A stranger.
But we have been genetically programmed to be frightened of strangers. Of people who do not behave the same way as us. Not too long ago it was normal for the young men of the tribe to attack the next village to kill, rape and steal. The correct reaction to a person who breaks social conventions is fear. If you can identify someone as a stranger, you can have a chance of protecting yourself and your family.
If you break social conventions you are announcing to the community that you are different, a stranger, dangerous,and it is inevitable that people will react negatively to you.
So what would you expect to happen when a man wears a dress, a wig and high heels?
20
A new book released this month objectively shows that the CIA, FBI, and US Secret Service have questions to answer about the assassination of JFK.
From Amazon Books:
90
The New York Times best seller list is not based on objective sales figures but editorial content, made up to suit the Official Narrative. This was determined in a court case as early as 1983 and others since then.
From Wikipedia:
90
Greens want to give 16 year olds the vote.
Today’s typical 16 year old couldn’t start an ICE lawn mower, let alone know voting issues.
Senator Babet (United Australia Party, VIC) comments.
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/vXVTUw136pBRfffQ/
120
While at the same time the Left argues that adulthood doesn’t happen until age 25.
https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-24173194
The crazy comes at us from both ends.
80
Oh, but you can begin altering your gender hormone chemistry with forever consequences at 14.
https://apnews.com/article/gender-transition-treatment-guidelines-9dbe54f670a3a0f5f2831c2bf14f9bbb
This is getting exhausting.
90
It’s crazy.
I wonder if the greens would be happy if 14 year olds were able to be tried for all crimes as an adult?
After-all they seem to think that 14 year olds have the maturity necessary to decide on hormone therapy and worse at that age.
It is very depressing how some people who have influence are so stupid.
170
Let’s look at what the Greens want.
‘The Greens have today announced plans to raise the age of criminal responsibility in NSW to 14 years of age ..’
‘“Medical and legal experts are in fierce agreement that children are developmentally incapable of criminal responsibility and the age should be raised.’
Now they want to give them the vote at 16. Would this mean they are adults and can be placed in adult jails?
Wow, teenagers mature quickly at 15.
80
On December 12, 1957, at the age of 13, Myra Brown married Jerry Lee Lewis, then 22, in Hernando, Mississippi. When Lewis arrived in London for a 37-date tour in May 1958, Brown revealed to a reporter at the airport that she was his wife. Lewis asserted that Brown was 15 years old and was his wife of two months.
30
The Greens want many stupid things. This is but one.
Personally my line is the age you can be cannon fodder. At that stage all adult rights apply.
80
“Personally my line is the age you can be cannon fodder. At that stage all adult rights apply.”
Personally my line is the age you can be cannon fodder. At that stage all adult rights and DUTIES apply.
Auto
20
Just read at the Herald online that Adam Bandt is being asked to explain how he managerd to spend $200k on printing and $23k on private jets. Im sure he has a plausable explaination that only other greens could understand. Meanwhile, while only represention about 10% of the population the greens still think they have the answers to everything, forgetting the simple fact that 90% of the population don’t think they have the answers to anything.
120
It gets worse as he had a petrol allowance of thousands of dollars. I thought that he was driven around in an EV?
And those private jets were not electric planes. As to those printing costs – Well, Self Promotion costs (The Taxpayer unfortunately).
70
More covid FWIW
“Fauci Deputy Warned Him Against Vaccine Mandates: Email”
https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/fauci-deputy-warned-him-against-vaccine-mandates-email
70
No point trying to advise Fauci.
After all he was “the science”.
70
I think Melbournistan Mayor Silly Crapp banning thr Moomba Parade was a cruel propaganda trick directed against children.
Children would have been looking forward to it an excited.
They would then be let down due to a declaration of “extreme weather” (i.e. what used to be called a “hot day”).
Then the children will be angry that their fun was ruined and will be more liable to believe the lies taught to them about a “dying planet”.
121
In 2013 the Moomba Festival was held with temps ranging from 33.0C to 37.1C over the four days.
In 2014 the festival had temps of 36C, 41C and 40C over three of the days.
This year, Melbourne had a 37.6C on Sat, 36.9C on Sun and 35.1C on Mon.
They must have been tougher before COVID.
110
An expensive topic.
I recently got COVID 19 for a second time.
I was pleased to quickly get a GP phone advised, anti viral treatment drug molnupiravir which I’ve been taking for three days and it seems to be working. Four capsules twice a day for five days and since I have a Commonwealth Seniors Health Care card I paid $6.70 for 40 capsules.
When I discovered the full cost was $1,102.24 or about $28 each capsule I thought I’d pass it on FWIW.
90
People who used ivermectin get better faster and were much less likely to die
190
All the best for speedy recovery and Thanks for sharing. Being similarly aged and pensioned good to find out about options available.
Tongue firmly in cheek an ebay funded super account is also looking healthier wink wink nudge nudge. LOL
50
FWIW
“Ukr West Armour Graveyard, 4th Abrams, 2 Caesars Destroyed, Ukr/West Despair FAB Bombs, Rus Advance”
https://rumble.com/v4ink0i-ukr-west-armour-graveyard-4th-abrams-2-caesars-destroyed-ukrwest-despair-fa.html
30
I always enjoy a good news story.
40
Tuesday sarcasm: the evolution of medicine
https://imgbox.com/aPhHlT4n
60
Pfizer accused of pandemic profiteering as profits double
8 Feb 2022 — The drugmaker made a net profit of nearly $22bn last year, up from $9.1bn in 2020
50
New Study Unearths Unexpected Findings About Red Meat
While the globalists wage war on eating meat, a new study finds that beef intake is associated with a LOWER risk of developing heart disease.
The Epoch Times reported:
A new study bucks recent trends in health research that say people who eat a lot of red or processed meat face an increased risk of heart disease.
A research team looked at UK Biobank data from over 1.8 million people: roughly 460,000 who ate processed meat, pork, beef, and mutton, respectively. Anyone with a history of cardiovascular disease was omitted from the study.
The team found that eating red or processed meat was not linked to a higher risk of cardiovascular disease. All odds ratios (ORs) of a person developing cardiovascular disease, coronary artery disease, stroke, heart failure, or atrial fibrillation were insignificant.
An odds ratio of 1.00 means there is no significant difference between eating meat, for instance, or not eating meat. An OR higher than 1.00 indicates the person is more at risk, and an OR below 1.00 means one is less at risk or that the intervention has a protective effect.
The link between beef intake and heart disease was even lower, with an OR of 0.7 for developing cardiovascular disease. Beef eaters were also at low risk for developing atrial fibrillation (OR 0.85) and heart failure (OR 0.80) but at a higher risk of experiencing stroke (OR 1.29).
In plain English, this means:
Beef intake lowers the risk of heart disease (30% lower chance).
Beef eaters have a 15% lower risk of developing atrial fibrillation.
Beef consumption leads to a 20% reduced risk of heart failure.
However, there’s a 29% increased risk of experiencing a stroke for beef eaters.
https://vigilantnews.com/post/new-study-unearths-unexpected-findings-about-red-meat/
120
If we weren’t meant to eat animals, why are they made of meat?
120
If we weren’t meant to eat animals, why did God make them so tasty!
00
The Big Mac will be around for a while – the Mac Bugger will be a hard sell.
Worldwide meat production increased nearly 5 times in the second half of the 20th century, and the amount eaten per person doubled. By 2050 meat consumption could increase by as much as another 160 percent.
40
Save the Planet – Eat More Meat
Human farts contain methane a dangerous Greenhouse Gas – so act in a socially responsible way.
https://www.menshealth.com/uk/nutrition/a37590491/vegan-men-fart-seven-times-more-than-non-vegans-study-finds/
50
What you you prefer – Cocaine or Lithium in your Soda?
The story of how Coca-Cola got its name is well known. It was invented in 1885 by John Pemberton, a pharmacist from Atlanta, Georgia, who made the original formula in his backyard. Pemberton’s recipe contained cocaine in the form of an extract of the coca leaf, which inspired the “Coca” part of the beverage’s name. The “Cola” comes from the kola nut (which contains caffeine, another stimulant).
The soft drink 7 Up has a lesser known history.
It contained lithium citrate, a mood-stabilizing drug, until 1948. It was one of a number of patent medicine products popular in the late-19th and early-20th centuries. Its name was later shortened to “7 Up Lithiated Lemon Soda” before being further shortened to just “7 Up” by 1936.
80
Heroin for Children?
Big Pharma has a well established track record!
How do you cure one drug epidemic? Create a new drug. That’s what happened in the late 1880s, when heroin was introduced as a safe and non-addictive substitute for morphine. Known as diamorphine, it was created by an English chemical researcher named C.R. Alder Wright in the 1870s, but it wasn’t until a chemist working for Bayer pharmaceuticals discovered Wright’s paper in 1895 that the drug came to market.
Finding it to be five times more effective—and supposedly less addictive—than morphine, Bayer began advertising a heroin-laced aspirin in 1898, which they marketed towards children suffering from sore throats, coughs, and cold. Some bottles depicted children eagerly reaching for the medicine, with moms giving their sick kids heroin on a spoon. Doctors started to have an inkling that heroin may not be as non-addictive as it seemed when patients began coming back for bottle after bottle. Despite the pushback from physicians and negative stories about heroin’s side effects pilling up, Bayer continued to market and produce their product until 1913. Eleven years later, the FDA banned heroin altogether.
40
“Heroin” is or was a trademark of Bayer.
10
The pilot of the plane that plummeted.
“I lost control of the plane. The gauges went blank for a second, then they came back on miraculously and the plane just righted itself on its own.” (ABC)
Would anyone like to make an educated guess?
40
“an educated guess?”
Putin?
20
Luckily the MCAS system must have been disabled.
40
Just shows how many don’t keep their seatbelts on.
90
We will never know
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13185019/Boeing-whistleblower-josh-barnett-dead-south-carolina.html
30
I was thinking a UAP is involved.
11
It was out of the blue.
‘Canadian passenger Brian Jokat described the terrifying ordeal onboard to 1News, saying he was “one of the lucky ones that walked off unscathed”.
“It happened so quick. There was no pre-turbulence – there was no bumping at all,” he said.’
10
Not an educated guess but rather the dinner party conversation of the reason for a certain other jet falling out of the sky some 20-30 years ago. Story goes that an air hostess was delivering the refreshments to the crew and got a bit too amorous with the pilot. The first engineer got a bit too interested in the cockpit proceedings and while performing his fuel load share duties (to maintain aircraft weight distribution) he inadvertently switched the fuel supply to an empty tank. No fuel no engines so dropped like a stone until a tank with fuel in it was connected up. The ups and downs of cockpit life.
30
Human error happens, but this particular event is very rare and beyond our comprehension.
I don’t understand why the plane fell without turbulence, but this might explain the instrumentation blackout.
‘The 1976 Tehran UFO Incident was a radar and visual sighting of an unidentified flying object (UFO) over Tehran, the capital of Iran, during the early morning hours of 19 September 1976. During the incident, two Imperial Iranian Air Force F-4 Phantom II jet interceptors reported losing instrumentation and communications as they approached the object. These were restored upon withdrawal.’ (wiki)
10
Clear air turbulence coupled with a strange coincidence.
‘In the absence of evidence, Hofmeyer said it was possible the LATAM jet had simply hit “clear air turbulence”, maybe even “coincidentally” at the same time a control panel went blank, as the passenger had claimed.’ (9News)
20
Boeing
10
Adam Bandt wins an Hypocracy Oscar at the Academy Awards – previous winners Al Gore and John Kerry
Despite his party’s core policy of cutting C02 emissions Mr Bandt used two private jets during the 2022 election campaign, landing tax payers with the $23,000 bill.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13184903/How-Greens-leader-Adam-Bandt-spent-thousands-private-jet-flights-lecturing-climate-change.html
40
Spending like a drunken sailor.
30
‘I need a solution fast’: Electric car owners complain of motion sickness
Here’s why electric cars might make you more carsick than conventional vehicles – and some strategies you can use to fix it.
With it beginning to look like an electric-only future, you might soon find yourself in an electric vehicle, wondering why you’re feeling much more carsick than when riding in an internal combustion car (ICE).
It’s slowly become one of the most popular questions on Reddit in the EV and Tesla threads: “Why do electric cars make me feel sick?”. One user even said they questioned buying a Tesla Model Y because of it.
“I’m thinking of buying a Model Y as it seems like the ideal electric family car, but I did a test drive yesterday and felt moderately motion sick afterwards,” wrote one Reddit user.
Another user said: “I drive in an electric vehicle a lot, and I’ve found that regenerative braking absolutely makes me motion sick. I’m not always driving, so I don’t always have control of how it’s being driven, so other people’s driving really makes me sick… I really need to find a solution fast”.
The reality is our bodies react differently to the forces in an electric car than to those we feel in an ICE vehicle, with EVs often confusing the brain based on what we’re seeing, hearing and feeling.
There are several factors at play; we have some home remedies you can try, plus a look at what car manufacturers are doing to combat this carsickness.
Why do I feel sick in an electric car?
Being behind the wheel in an electric car will likely save you from suffering motion sickness because you’re in control of the vehicle and know what’s coming next.
A study titled Knowing what’s coming: Anticipatory audio cues can mitigate motion sickness explained why drivers often don’t feel the same motion sickness as their passengers.
“Being able to anticipate upcoming motion is known to potentially mitigate sickness resulting from provocative motion,” the 2020 study from Vrije University in the Netherlands stated.
The research also provided insight into why electric cars may make you motion sick, and it actually comes down to their lack of sound.
“Average illness ratings were significantly lower for the condition that contained informative auditory cues, as compared to the condition without informative cues. This knowledge, i.e. that auditory signals can improve anticipation of motion, could be of importance in reducing carsickness in domains such as that of autonomous vehicles,” the paper found.
A key factor that needs to be considered is the lack of engine noise in EVs. Our bodies are accustomed to riding in internal combustion vehicles, so the lack of noise and vibration in an EV can actually throw your balance off.
Another of the main contributors to carsickness in an EV is something called regenerative braking – a system in electric cars that generates force through the resistance while off the throttle to help charge the battery and add some extra range. This regenerative braking can often feel more aggressive and happen more frequently than conventional braking, particularly in stop-start traffic.
EVs also have a lot more torque and a more linear acceleration compared to their internal combustion counterparts. This means that those who aren’t used to the immediate power and heavy acceleration associated with electric cars will often anticipate a lot less acceleration than usual, causing the body to get confused.
Another small factor that needs to be pointed out is the growing size of built-in screens in modern vehicles – not just electric cars.
Many passengers can be caught out by staring at the computer-sized head units that cover half the dash in models from the likes of Tesla or Polestar. Taking your eyes off the road and focusing on a large screen can throw your balance off, although it’s hard not to stare at it when it’s right there in front of you.
60
I’d imagine not just lack of sound but the brain gets unexpected and unaccustomed sensory inputs from the eyes and vestibular apparatus for acceleration.
Very mild BPPV of sorts.
10
I drive on the highway and have my phone on the instrument screen behind the steering wheel, sometimes. I might be listening to a stream and I want to see the video they use for a bit, so mainly listening with occasional brief watching. I find it perfectly safe.
But I’m a very good driver, it’s simply about choosing your time, assessing risk. And being stimulated on the dual highway is a wise thing, because it can put you to sleep, by design. That feeling of going too slow at a constant rate over a long time, now that is dangerous, and that is what highways are.
13
It gets worse as he had a petrol allowance of thousands of dollars. I thought that he was driven around in an EV?
And those private jets were not electric planes. As to those printing costs – Well, Self Promotion costs (The Taxpayer unfortunately).
30
Communists have no compunction spending other people’s money,
what’s yours is theirs. 🙁
60
Heads I win, tails you lose. The communist manifesto.
30
“Communist” is so 20th century.
It is now known as ‘Empathic Collectivism’.
You contribute money, they contribute mental pathology.*
Stir and allow to steep.
*(The key ingredients of ‘Pandemic’.)
20
Biden unveils massive new budget with $6 trillion in tax increases, $36,000 in tax hikes per family; National Debt would grow by $1.8 trillion in one year.
In a move that could reshape the nation’s financial landscape, President Biden has revealed a budget proposal of unprecedented proportions, amounting to a staggering $7.3 trillion for the fiscal year 2025. This budget, while reflecting ambitious plans for tax increases and increased spending on various fronts, has ignited concerns about the escalating U.S. debt trajectory.
Adding to the financial strain, the budget proposes almost $36,000 in tax hikes per family, with $4.9 trillion in new taxes and over $2 trillion in additional spending earmarked for the “woke agenda.” As the debate over Biden’s budget unfolds, one thing remains certain: the potential consequences of such ambitious fiscal policies could have a profound impact on the nation’s economic future. With looming questions about tax hikes, increased spending, and the trajectory of U.S. debt, Americans are left to grapple with the uncertain financial landscape that lies ahead.
https://citizenwatchreport.com/biden-unveils-massive-new-budget-with-6-trillion-in-tax-increases-36000-in-tax-hikes-per-family-national-debt-would-grow-by-1-8-trillion-in-one-year/
No way out any more, other than the big reset.
70
Word of the day:
antimacassar
10
I had known about antimacassars. We have them everywhere. And they work with hair, arm rests. Furniture gets dirty quickly. Often on aircraft too. But I did not know about ‘macassar oil’
“Macassar oil is an oil that was originally compounded from Macassar ebony oil that was used primarily by Western European men throughout the 1800s and early 1900s as a hair conditioner to groom and style the hair. It was popularised by Alexander Rowland, a celebrated London barber. ”
And it was a real problem when men really oiled their hair for that Clarke Gable slicked down black hair.
20
Turning a meme into words:
110
I think you’re milking that meme for meaning.
10
As I remember from one Green commentator, if meat is murder, milk is prostitution.
30
No, no, no, no, no, …pausing to think.
The bacteria in the gut of the cow eats the grass, and in return for all that tasty grass and a home, the bacteria feed the cow.
WoW, i said all that without the caps lock getting stuck.
10
How do you handle being “interviewed” by an ABC Woman in Red?
Ted O’Brien is not doing too badly just now. He might be getting one word in of every four.
And he might not.
10
FWIW
“Iron Ore’s Steep Decline Intensifies”
https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/iron-ores-steep-decline-intensifies
00