‘Doc Who Received JFK After He Was Shot In Dallas Describes Efforts To Save Him—& What Happened Next’ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfZS1nu-OeQ
10:14
Testimony in US Congress, yesterday (or day before).
Observed entrance wound in temple, exit back of the head.
The first throat shot was fatal.
Magic bullet not possible.
He or other attending physicians never questioned by Warren Commission … (clue).
All told to never discuss what they saw with anyone, including each other.
Observed LBJ calmly giving orders on a phone unguarded in a side room and wondered ‘why is he unprotected, this could be a coup against the US, how do they know the danger has passed?’
Amazing this fellow is still alive.
62 years, and I don’t think he’s ever been asked to testify in an open authoritative forum.
I shall refrain myself from my usual pattern of stating the usual obvious conspiratorial conclusions.
This is a additional testimony by the doctor.
‘BOMBSHELL: Doctor Who Tried To Save JFK Says, ‘The Magic Bullet Didn’t Strike The President At All’ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQGSmYSaKiA
5:30
“The Warren Commission did not call me to testify at all”.
What if the US Covid pandemic response was not a public health response run by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), CDC or any other public health body. Instead, it was a biodefence or counter-terrorism response, run by the Pentagon, National Security Council and Department of Homeland Security.
That is the question at the core of my new book The Deep State Goes Viral: Pandemic Planning and the Covid Coup (published by the Brownstone Institute). https://www.amazon.co.uk/Deep-State-Goes-Viral-Pandemic/dp/1630692999
…
When I continued to dig, I found that the same pattern was followed in many countries around the world. The pandemic response, according to all available evidence, was implemented according to globally planned and directed protocols.
…if it had been a regular public health response, Covid would not have differed from any of the viral epidemics or pandemics of the last century. The public would have been told to remain calm, wash hands frequently and stay home if sick. Public health agencies would have tracked clusters of severe disease and treated them accordingly. This would have happened at different times in different locations. Most people would barely have been aware that there was a novel virus circulating among them.
Instead, the response to Covid was the exact opposite. The media and public health agencies whipped the population into levels of panic massively disproportionate to the threat actually posed by the virus. Everyone was convinced that the only way to ‘beat the virus’ was to lock down the whole world and wait for a never-before-tested or manufactured vaccine.
…
As explained by a generally unknown civil-servant-turned-author named Michael Lofgren who, according to an NPR report, popularised the term ‘Deep State’ in his 2014 Anatomy of the Deep State, the Deep State can be understood as “a hybrid of corporate America and the national security state”, which constitutes a “government within the government” that “operates according to no Constitutional rules or any constraint by the governed”.
According to Lofgren’s definition… “the military-industrial complex, Wall Street – they’re both about money, sucking as much money out of the country as they can, and control: corporate control and political control”. Plus, I would add, this is now happening not just on a national, but on a global, level.
Almost All ‘Extreme’ Temperature Highs in UK Now Being Recorded at Junk Sites with Massive Possible Errors
I looked at the last nine days of Met Office records to Sunday May 18th and can reveal that nearly nine out of 10 local ‘extreme’ daily temperature highs were posted in junk Class 4 and super junk Class 5 sites with internationally-recognised ‘uncertainties’ of 2°C and 5°C respectively.
…
As we have shown many times at the Daily Sceptic, this super-heated data is fed into the mainstream to promote the political needs of Net Zero.
Another machine we’ll come to depend upon and won’t be able to live without. I can’t even imagine the need this thing is designed to fulfil.
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman Wants to Put an Al ‘Companion Device’ in Every Home
…a device that will be fully aware of a user’s surroundings and life, unobtrusive, and able to rest comfortably in one’s pocket or on a desk. This AI companion is envisioned as a third core device, alongside a MacBook Pro and an iPhone.
…
The goal is to release the device by late next year, with plans to ship an unprecedented 100 million units faster than any company has ever achieved with a new product.
…a device that will be fully aware of a user’s surroundings and life,
Totalitarian governments would love this under their control.
Essentially it’s the the Telescreen from 1984. However with universal application. In 1984 the Proles didn’t get Telescreens as they were deemed sufficiently indoctrinated not to rebel or be a problem. Only members of the Inner Party and Outer Party got them. A situation much as we have now.
Ironically, Goolag AI says:
A telescreen is a two-way television screen that monitors individuals in dystopian settings like Oceania in George Orwell’s 1984. It is a symbol of constant surveillance and the erosion of privacy in totalitarian regimes. In the novel, telescreens are ubiquitous, often found in every home and business, and can be used for both monitoring citizens and broadcasting propaganda.
…
Propaganda and Surveillance:
They are a primary tool for spreading Party propaganda and keeping citizens under constant surveillance, ensuring they adhere to the Party’s ideology.
Unavoidable Presence:
Telescreens are almost never turned off and are found everywhere, creating a sense of constant observation and fear.
Symbol of Totalitarian Control:
They represent the Party’s absolute control over its citizens, as the telescreen allows for a constant monitoring of behavior and a chilling fear of being watched, even when alone.
During WWII, the military analyzed the bullet holes on returning fighter planes to determine where to add more armor. The red dots in the image show where the planes that made it back were most commonly hit.
Initially, the military considered reinforcing the areas with the most bullet holes — the wings, tail, and outer fuselage. But statistician Abraham Wald pointed out a critical insight:
These are the planes that survived. The hits they sustained were not fatal.
Wald argued that the areas with few or no bullet holes — like the engine and cockpit — were the critical weak points. Planes hit in those areas didn’t return, so those missing data points were crucial.
This story teaches us survivorship bias — the logical error of focusing only on the people or things that survived a process while overlooking those that didn’t, often leading to false conclusions.
It’s a classic case in statistics and decision-making, still taught widely today.
Australia and Singapore support research projects to reduce maritime emissions
26 March 2025
Australia and Singapore have selected eight projects for funding as part of a $20 million initiative to help reduce emissions in the maritime sector.
The Australia-Singapore Initiative on Low Emissions Technologies (ASLET) supports the objectives of the Singapore and Australia Green and Digital Shipping Corridor (GDSC), which will help accelerate decarbonisation and digitisation of shipping routes between Singapore and Australia.
It is jointly delivered by the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Australia’s national science agency, and the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA) on behalf of the governments of Australia and Singapore.
The ASLET grant opportunity was launched in July 2024 to support projects that will help accelerate the deployment and uptake of zero or near-zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emission technologies for maritime and port operations.
A total of 32 applications were received from universities, research institutes and industry based in Australia and Singapore.
The eight projects selected for funding cover a range of activities, including innovations in the supply, transport, storage, dispensing and maritime utilisation of hydrogen, ammonia and methanol, as well as safety and environmental monitoring, and electrification.
President Dwight D. Eisenhower was the original driving force behind the creation of the US civilian nuclear power sector. The vast majority of the current fleet of 94 operating reactors in the country can be traced back to his personal leadership, beginning with the formation of the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) in 1954. The AEC was charged with weapons development, safety regulations, and—critically—encouraging private investment in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy, especially for electric power. The subsequent two decades saw Eisenhower’s vision carried out with military discipline as the AEC partnered with industry to facilitate the construction of new reactors.
Ironically, things came to a grinding halt after the energy crisis of 1973. One might have expected the oil embargo to motivate the US to accelerate its civilian nuclear ambitions. Instead, the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974 effectively abolished the AEC and transferred regulatory oversight to the newly formed Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). The NRC’s mandate was limited strictly to regulation and safety, while promotional objectives were deemphasized. It didn’t take long for the new regime to effectively halt new reactor construction in the country.
The main weapon of the NRC is the linear no-threshold (LNT) model—an unscientific ethos that treats all exposure to radiation, no matter how minute, as both dangerous and cumulative. In other words, there is no threshold below which otherwise insignificant exposures are considered harmless. Combined with the risk-averse bureaucrat mindset and you get this astonishing result: only two of the current fleet of US reactors were approved and built under the auspices of the NRC.
For anti-nuclear Malthusian environmentalists, the LNT model is ideal. It allows them to actively stunt the creation and distribution of energy abundance while shielding themselves behind the guise of safety and alleged expertise. Zero is an emotional number and when any amount of radiation is viewed as inherently bad, the complete absence of exposure is treated as inherently good, regardless of the positive tradeoffs foregone as a consequence.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok
The mutha of ‘conspiracy theories’ and The Blob.
‘Doc Who Received JFK After He Was Shot In Dallas Describes Efforts To Save Him—& What Happened Next’
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfZS1nu-OeQ
10:14
Testimony in US Congress, yesterday (or day before).
Observed entrance wound in temple, exit back of the head.
The first throat shot was fatal.
Magic bullet not possible.
He or other attending physicians never questioned by Warren Commission … (clue).
All told to never discuss what they saw with anyone, including each other.
Observed LBJ calmly giving orders on a phone unguarded in a side room and wondered ‘why is he unprotected, this could be a coup against the US, how do they know the danger has passed?’
Amazing this fellow is still alive.
62 years, and I don’t think he’s ever been asked to testify in an open authoritative forum.
I shall refrain myself from my usual pattern of stating the usual obvious conspiratorial conclusions.
30
This is a additional testimony by the doctor.
‘BOMBSHELL: Doctor Who Tried To Save JFK Says, ‘The Magic Bullet Didn’t Strike The President At All’
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQGSmYSaKiA
5:30
“The Warren Commission did not call me to testify at all”.
30
More at:
https://dailysceptic.org/2025/05/21/how-the-deep-state-went-viral/
11
Almost All ‘Extreme’ Temperature Highs in UK Now Being Recorded at Junk Sites with Massive Possible Errors
20
Another machine we’ll come to depend upon and won’t be able to live without. I can’t even imagine the need this thing is designed to fulfil.
10
Totalitarian governments would love this under their control.
Essentially it’s the the Telescreen from 1984. However with universal application. In 1984 the Proles didn’t get Telescreens as they were deemed sufficiently indoctrinated not to rebel or be a problem. Only members of the Inner Party and Outer Party got them. A situation much as we have now.
Ironically, Goolag AI says:
00
A lesson in “survorship bias”. Copied.
00
Another area where CSIRO wastes money and resources is “maritime emissions”.
What are they going to do, reintroduce sailing ships? Well, not yet, but they do want to run ships on hydrogen, ammonia and methanol.
00
A very good article.
Under TRUMP, the US is returning its nuclear industry to a “can do” approach, not a “can’t do” one.
00